The Rejected Feminine

In the feature-length documentary film, Matter of Heart: The Extraordinary Journey of C.G. Jung Into the Soul of Man, one of Jung's close friends, Sir Laurens van der Post, while discussing Toni Wolff, had this to say about the rejected feminine:

"Jung had an instinct at what was wrong with life, what made life tear apart, made it incomplete, was because the feminine was rejected – driven insane, driven mad by a world of men, rejected by a masculine-dominated world. And that time when [Jung] let himself go, and when he landed deep down in what he came to call the collective unconscious, all this rejected feminine in himself confronted him."

Here is the description of the film from the producers at the C.G. Jung Institute of Los Angeles:

"In 1985, after five years of work, reviewing the original footage, and collecting additional film and photo material, a feature length documentary film, Matter of Heart, was written and produced. This film was first launched in 35mm format and shown in theaters throughout the United States and in major cities in Canada, England, Western Europe, Japan, Australia, South America, and South Africa. It received much positive critical acclaim and was viewed by thousands of people in theaters, at film festivals, and in small private showings.

"In 1987, the U.S. Consul General to Switzerland, Louis Segesvary, held a party at his embassy home in Zurich and invited Jungians and many friends to celebrate the success of this film. Franz Jung, Jung's son, attended this showing and gave his approval for the way the film portrayed, in a sensitive and truthful manner, Jung's relationship with Toni Wolff, his relationship to his wife Emma, and his family as well. Sir Laurens van der Post, who had been filmed in London, also attended this event and gave his blessings for the project."

The DVD is available from Amazon.com.

The Shadow of Jungian Psychology

Remembering Jung is a series of interviews with the first generation of Jungian analysts. All 32 DVDs are available for purchase from Amazon, or to stream online from the C.G. Jung Institute of Los Angeles (link fixed Jan. 6, 2021).

Marie-Louise von Franz’s interview is in 3 parts, and in part 2 she answered the question, “What is the shadow of Analytical Psychology as it has developed since Jung?”

“The shadow of Jungian psychology I see mostly in the fact that Jung has found out everything he has found out through groping in the dark and tremendous suffering, and we are given that in our hands – what he has found out. We are, so to speak, dispensing a medicine which we have not made, and therefore people get inflated. They forget that they have not suffered, they have not found out those truths, they are merely using them. And because they are useful and you can cure people with them, then you get inflated. You think, ‘Oh, I am the great healer.’ ... You forget that it is not your doing, it is Jung who found these things out. Many Jungians forget, where am I? How far have I gotten with my own dreams, my own visions, my own shadow and my own animus or anima? And there the results look much more poor sometimes. They forget that that is the important thing. That is especially an illness of men – they feel crushed by Jung and therefore they say, ‘I must say different!’ For instance, they take a concept of Jung and they give it another name, but it means exactly the same thing – just to be original and creative and not just a Jungian or so on. And that all shows that they haven’t understood that it is a reality with which one is confronted, that one’s task is to confront oneself with the same reality with which he has confronted himself. That's the same thing. And then if one does that oneself and if one stays loyal to one’s own work on one’s self – one is constantly by one's own shadow, dreams, etc., reminded that one is not Jung and hasn't gotten that far as he got. But the danger is inflation.”

From the DVD, Remembering Jung: A Conversation about C.G. Jung and his work with Marie-Louise von Franz - II, 1977

Candid Times with J. Gary Sparks

On Friday, September 4, I had the pleasure of spending the entire day at the home of Jungian analyst J. Gary Sparks where he graciously allowed me to snap a few photos and shoot a couple of videos. In Hitchhiking in Küsnacht, Gary tells the story of how Daryl Sharp saved his life; and in The Bookshelves of J. Gary Sparks, Gary brings the Freud & Jung action figures to life as he retells one of the strangest stories I've ever heard. If you haven't already, you can listen to our interview here: Episode #2 – J. Gary Sparks.

Who is Daryl Sharp?

Daryl Sharp passed away peacefully on October 8, 2019 – In Memoriam: Daryl Sharp 1936-2019

The following narrative was provided to Speaking of Jung by Daryl in 2015.

Daryl Leonard Merle Sharp was born in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, on Jan. 2, 1936, a Capricorn.

In 1892, his maternal grandparents, aged 3, emigrated from a German enclave in Odessa, third largest city in Ukraine (then White Russia). They travelled on a freighter separately with their respective parents. Years later they met in Regina, Saskatchewan. They married in a Catholic church, but he thinks they were actually Jewish, for he often heard his mother speaking Yiddish with her mom’s old friends, and later in life the German language came easily to him.

His babushka Martha Weist never learned to read or write English, though her husband Martin became a typesetter on the local newspaper, The Regina Leader Post. He spent many evenings in United Church basements playing Bingo with his gramma as she stuffed him with hot dogs and cokes, potato chips and chocolate bars, for which he later lost a lot of teeth. She always won something (napkins, silverware, lamps). She died in 1972 in an old age home playing gin rummy with her cronies at the age of 86. Martin had died 10 years earlier.

Daryl's mother Marion, born 1910, was a chorus girl, a “flapper” in the “roaring twenties.” His father Emery worked for years as a brakeman on the Canadian National Railway (CNR) before becoming a bank teller. In 1942 he joined the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) as an accountant. Daryl had one brother, two years older, who bullied him from time to time, but with affection. Daryl’s mother took Eros into the kitchen, where she held the family together. She always claimed Daryl was named after the movie mogul Darryl F. Zanuck, but she couldn’t account for the difference in spelling. One of Daryl’s middle names came from his uncle Len, a feckles prairies boozer; the other from his father’s brother Merle, a sober accountant with the Royal Bank of Canada in Regina.

The Sharp family moved frequently from one air force base to another across Canada, spending a year or so in each province, ending up in Middleton, Nova Scotia, where Daryl completed his high school years in 1953 at the head of his class. He excelled at badminton, basketball, snooker, table tennis, and had a rep as a budding ladies man. He read only science-fiction, publishing and distributing his own fan-zine at the age of sixteen. His only ambition was to emulate Hugo Gernsbach, publisher of Amazing Stories and a multitude of other sci-fi magazines.

Father Emery was posted to Ottawa in 1953. It was timely, for Daryl had just won a scholarship to Carleton University in Ottawa, where he spent the next four years acquiring a B.Sc. in maths and physics and a post-graduate B.J. in journalism while he was president of the Students’ Council. This was just before Carleton moved from its constricted quarters with 750 students in an old Teachers’ College building to its luxurious new campus with a current enrolment of about 40,000.

In the summer of 1956, Daryl found a summer job on an isolated Eskimo reserve, Coral Island, in the middle of Hudson Bay. He was a “shoran (short-range) analyst,” charting the frozen tundra from radio signals sent daily by aircraft passing overhead. This stint ended earlier than expected because the cabin he'd helped build burned down when his mates wrestled and knocked over an oil-stove after drinking on the reserve.

After graduating from Carleton in 1957, Daryl was wooed by several conglomerates, and finally recruited by Procter & Gamble for the then-princely salary of $3,000 a year after being flown to Cincinnati to be blessed by the brass. He moved to Toronto, where he had an office and title as Director of Public Relations for Canada. He was 21 years old; he had a midnight-blue suit, Brylcreem (“a little dab’ll do ya”) and a key to the executive washroom. He had two cameras and a buxom blonde secretary named Gladys. His Bible was Dale Carnegie’s How To Win Friends and Influence People. He was head of the bowling team and editor of the in-house magazine Moonbeams. He was an extraverted social animal and cock of the walk with the young secretaries. He lived in a fraternity house in the downtown core and had a reputation as a dynamite dancer.

Daryl was quite content. He loved his job. He photographed factory workers and wrote articles about their happy blue-collar lives (mostly fantasy).  All was well until he fell in with some literary friends who mocked him as Organization Man and convinced him that his talents were wasted at P&G. Daryl had repressed ambitions as a writer, and so, for the first time ever, he was conflicted. He chewed on this for many months.

At last, in 1959, with savings of $1,000, Daryl chose a twin-screw steamer to France over a 1958 Ford Thunderbird convertible. On board this slow-moving little ship with maybe 300 passengers, for two weeks Daryl produced the daily newsletter slipped under doors at 8 a.m., and won the ping-pong tournament. He found some pretty ladies to romance and avoided gay hustlers, but mostly he wrote about his experience.

The boat docked in Le Havre. It was a short train trip to Paris, where Daryl had a rollicking time as a struggling writer shacked up with a madamoiselle on the Left Bank until his money ran out. He then debouched to England, where he found ready employment for awhile as a substitute teacher in high schools and packing books in the prestigious Harrod's department store. At night he went to plays or haunted Covent Garden for the ballet and opera. It was emotionally exhilarating after the cultural wasteland that Toronto then was.

In 1960, homesick Daryl returned to Canada and landed a job with Canadian Press (CP). This work was much too boring, and so he applied to the Berlitz School for an assignment teaching English abroad, which he was given in the heartland of Germany, Bad Kreuznach (near Frankfurt). This was an enlightening experience with frauleins, but he could barely survive on 400 marks ($100 a month), so he returned to Toronto, where he worked as a short-order cook in a café and assiduously rebuffed offers to return to mainstream corporate life.

After six months, desperate to return to England, through a friend’s father he secured a seat on a rhesus monkey flight out of Moncton, New Brunswick to Manchester, England. This was not a pleasant flight, just him and the pilot and two dozen monkeys pissing and defecating for 18 hours. From the home of the Beatles he made his way to London, where he found lodgings in a Chelsea basement apartment with four other young ex-pat Canadians who thrived on pubs and seducing young lovelies. He again made a bare living as a substitute teacher in those horrid secondary modern schools, where half the class was preparing for a life of crime and the other half asleep. (“Stick with it, Sir, we don’t want to lose you!”)

When Daryl was still 23 years old, his life of carefree debauchery came to a sudden end when he became besotted with a lovely young ex-pat (code name B.), whom he enticed to go to the south of France and live with him in a tent on the side of a hill in a small fishing village (Sète), near Montpelier and Saint Tropez. From there they toured Europe on her scooter for several months, making good use of fully-equipped youth hostels. It was idyllic until B. became pregnant. They then returned to London, where they married in Chelsea Old Church. For a few years they lived catch-as-catch-can in Chelsea, Knightsbridge, Putney, Devon, and finally in a seventeenth-century cottage in the small hamlet of Heyshott in West Sussex, where Daryl worked on his manuscripts in a shed at the foot of the garden and compiled indexes for London publishers. All very romantic, with two small sons.

Over time, Daryl had become obsessed with “existentialist” writers like Kafka, Rilke, Kierkegaard, Sartre, Nietzsche, Dostoyevski, Henry Miller, and Carl Gustav Jung. In 1963 he applied to the new University of Sussex in Brighton for the post-graduate M.A. degree in literature and philosophy, code-named “The Modern European Mind.” He was accepted and excelled, and the next year he was recommended for an exchange position at the University of Dijon in France. Daryl and B. jumped at the chance. To finance their impending cross-channel adventure, Daryl took a job as a common laborer rebuilding the Waterloo Bridge; his wage was 2 and 6 – two shillings and six pence (US 60 cents) an hour. Not much, but it added up over a few weeks, eight hours a day plus overtime. In Dijon, Daryl planned to do a Ph.D. thesis called “In Search of the Self,” explicating the work of Soren Kierkegaard (“The Religious Self”), D. H. Lawrence (“The Vital Self”), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (“The Natural Self”). He might have added Jung (“The Psychological Self”) if he had known that great man well enough at the time. Rousseau’s papers were archived in the University of Dijon, and Daryl’s French was adequate to the task. In exchange, Daryl would teach a few weekly classes in English, and once a month would partake of the 6-course all-male dinner with wines from the Route des Grand Crus (“road of the great wines”). B., innately feminist, did not relish being left out, but that was the protocol. 

It was not an easy year in Dijon. For the first month they lived in a youth hostel with their two kids, until a humble apartment was found for them in a building where thirty residents shared one outdoor unenclosed toilette.

They packed their old green van, B. now eight months pregnant, and drove back to England in July of 1966, camping on the way to wake up to a herd of large and fearsome cows nudging the windows. He never camped again. Two weeks later, their third child was born, named Tanya after that rascal Henry Miller’s paramour in Tropic of Cancer. Daryl’s painstaking dissertation was rejected by the University of Sussex as “expository but not original.” This put an end to his vague thoughts of an academic career.

In 1969 they decided to return to Canada and live in B.’s inherited house in Burlington, Ontario, a small town 40 miles from Toronto. This move was accomplished with no small labors, but being back in Canada was good for awhile. Daryl found freelance work with publishers in Toronto and commuted back and forth. However, all was not well in the Sharp household. I think Daryl was a decent father but not a great husband. He could not abide mowing grass for eight hours a week, and he was not cut out to be “the (handy) man around the house.” B. too was not happy. They both turned to others for solace.

The climax came when Daryl was dislodging a beehive in the house eaves and was stung by a bee. He went into anaphilactic shock and spent two days in the hospital. He underwent allergy treatments for a year, but it turned out he was only allergic to B. The symbolism did not escape him. He flew back to London, where he woke up one morning from a dream and couldn’t stop crying. The next day he started seeing a Jungian analyst, Dr. Anthony Stevens, who helped him off his knees for a couple of weeks. Daryl wanted and needed more, but first he had to go home to inform his family and quit his job, for in 1970 a group of playwrights had hired him as director of the Playwright’s Co-op, established to publish Canadian plays with a small staff supported by a government grant. It was a sign of Canada’s burgeoning cultural life. Daryl traveled across Canada promoting the plays to theatres in other provinces. He meanwhile grew marijuana (“Belltower Fineglow”) in the Burlington garden behind the corn and hid in the basement toking his home-grown weed in quiet desperation.

In 1973, with himself and his marriage in tatters, he flew back to England to continue analysis. After a few months he went to Zürich to inquire about Jungian training. With references from the writer Robertson Davies and the academic Northrop Frye, he was accepted, but had to wait until fall 1974 to enter the program. Back in Canada, he suggested B. sell her house and go to Zürich with him and the children. She refused (in retrospect a wise decision). Two weeks after Christmas 1973 Daryl tussled with B., tearfully kissed his kids goodbye and took a midnight bus to Toronto, where for eight months he lived in a seedy basement apartment whose walls he papered with paintings of mandalas and dream images and rejection slips.

In Switzerland, Daryl found work teaching English and editing books. Much more happened in between, but in 1978 he graduated with a Diploma in Jungian Psychology. He then returned to Toronto and the three children he had missed terribly. B. unexpectedly assumed they would resume their married life, but Daryl had other plans in mind. Bitter and emotionally bereft, B. delayed their divorce until 1983. On receipt of the divorce nisi, Daryl bought an old Victorian house a few blocks from his long-ago office at P&G. Synchronicity, anyone?

Daryl Sharp is no idiot savant, though some claim he was an idiot, if not wise, to found a publishing house in 1980, Inner City Books, catering exclusively to a then-niche Jungian market. He first published his Zürich thesis, The Secret Raven: Conflict and Transformation in the Life of Franz Kafka, but he did not want to be a one-shot vanity press, so he solicited manuscripts from other analysts. Over time this modest enterprise (never more than three people, including his grown offspring, one after another, and senior editor Victoria Cowan (code name Vicki), with whom he fathered Jessy Kate (code name JK) netted him a small fortune, most of which he gave to his kids to buy their houses or to shelters for abused women. Always following where his introverted energy wanted to go, he published his own books (more than 30) and works by some 50 other analysts, including Marie-Louise von Franz (who graciously agreed to be his patron), Marion Woodman, Edward F. Edinger, Anthony Stevens, James Hollis and J. Gary Sparks – a canon of 150 titles, all “Jung at Heart.”

▪️Daryl passed away on October 8, 2019. You can read his obituary in the Toronto newspaper The Globe and Mail.

▪️You can listen to our interviews with Daryl in Episode 1 and Episode 5.

▪️Please find a complete list of Daryl’s publications on his Inner City Books author page.

The Elephant

THE ebony elephant, standing on the base of a Pan figure, on a table in Daryl Sharp's consultation room.

UPDATE: I was able to upload a short video that I took of the elephant as well as a small figurine that Daryl has which once belonged to the late Jungian analyst Edward F. Edinger. I apologize for the video quality, which is really quite poor, but it is a glimpse inside the consultation room in Mr. Sharp's home. You can watch it here on YouTube.

If you haven't heard by now, I had the honor of visiting Inner City Books in Toronto on Thursday. The plan was to visit with Daryl Sharp for a bit, then record the first episode of the podcast, face-to-face. I wound up spending 10 hours with him before four people had to practically drag me away at eight o'clock that evening.

There's just too much to tell you in one blog post. I'm going to have to do this installments. Remember, I'm not a writer.

One of the biggest surprises for me was seeing the elephant – the one mentioned in Jungian Psychology Unplugged: My Life as an Elephant – sitting on the table next to me when I first sat down with Daryl.

"The elephant? That's THE elephant!?"

Indeed, it was.

I first met Daryl Sharp in 2002 when the Jung Association of Central Ohio invited him to Columbus to give a two-day presentation on that very book. After his talk, I purchased a copy and held it dear, for on the cover were two elephants, standing lovingly head-to-head. This was a book about Jungian psychology, discussing difficult concepts such as the shadow, projection, complexes, and neurosis. What's with the two elephants snuggling on the cover?

The book opens with Daryl's story of walking in the hills of Zürich, feeling bleak and sorry for himself, when he sees a small dark object in his path. It was a little elephant made of ebony. "On the spot, I fell in love," he remembered. That story, that wonderful story, stuck with me all these years. It's part of what drew me to Daryl. {You can read the rest of it on page 7 of the book.}

And there it was, 41 years later, sitting on the table next to me. I had come all the way from Chicago, and "it," all the way from Zürich. So there we were. Oh, and Daryl too. It was a numinous start to a numinous day.

Jung's Recommendations

Updated Feb. 2, 2021

From the chapter, “On the Frontiers of Knowledge,” an interview with C.G. Jung conducted by the French-Swiss writer Georges Duplain:

You speak of a change of era, of a new Platonic month, of the passage into another sign of the zodiac. What do you mean by that, what reality do such constellations have?

People don’t like you to talk about that, you will get yourself laughed at. Nobody has read Plato—you haven’t either. Yet he is one of those who have come closest to the truth. The influence of the constellations, the zodiac, they exist; you cannot explain why, it’s a “Just-So Story,” that proves itself by a thousand signs. But men always go from one extreme to the other, either they don’t believe, or they are credulous, any knowledge or faith can be ridiculed on the basis of what small minds do with it. That’s stupid and, above all, it’s dangerous. The great astrological periods do exist. Taurus and Gemini were prehistoric periods, we don’t know much about them. But Aries the Ram is closer; Alexander the Great was one of its manifestations. That was from 2000 B.C. to the beginning of the Christian era. With that era we came into the sign of the Fishes. It was not I who invented all the fish symbols there are in Christianity: the fisher of men, the pisciculi christianorum. Christianity has marked us deeply because it incarnates the symbols of the era so well. It goes wrong in so far as it believes itself to be the only truth; when what it is is one of the great expressions of truth in our time. To deny it would be to throw the baby out with the bathwater. What comes next? Aquarius, the Water-pourer, the falling of water from one place to another. And the little fish receiving the water from the pitcher of the Water-pourer, and whose principal star is Fomalhaut, which means the “fish’s mouth.” In our era the fish is the content; with the Water-pourer, he becomes the container. It’s a very strange symbol. I don’t dare interpret it. So far as one can tell, it is the image of a great man approaching. One finds, besides, a lot of things about this in the Bible itself: there are more things in the Bible than the theologians can admit.

It’s a matter of experience that the symbolism changes from one sign to another, and there is the risk that this passage will be all the more difficult for the men of today and tomorrow because they no longer believe in it, no longer want to be conscious of it. Why, when Pope Pius XII in one of his last discourses deplored that the world was no longer conscious enough of the presence of angels, he was saying to his faithful Catholics in Christian terms exactly what I am trying to say in terms of psychology to those who stand more chance of understanding this language than any other.

But what recommendations can you make for the passage that is about to take place, whose difficulties you fear?

A spirit of greater openness towards the unconscious, an increased attention to dreams, a sharper sense of the totality of the physical and the psychic, of their indissolubility; a livelier taste for self-knowledge. Better established mental hygiene, if you want to put it that way. The religions have tried to be this, but the result is not entirely satisfactory, don’t you agree?

What is very important is to exist, and that’s rarer than one realizes. To have a daily task and to accomplish it; and at the same time to attend to what is going on, inside oneself as well as outside, conscious of all life’s forms, all its expressions. To follow the major rules, but also to give free rein to the least familiar aspects of oneself. Drawing, and the fantasies and visions that it brought about, was a valuable thing. Now we take photographs, and that doesn’t fill the same need at all. In return, the painters recognize no limits to the most impassioned fantasy. They are becoming specialists in certain needs for expression; but all of us have these needs, we can’t divide up the personality’s inside work the way we think we can divide its outside activity. That breaks up something essential in it and causes an appalling psychic illness. In writing about flying saucers, I explained why men are so attentive to anything resembling a circle or a ball, the symbols of unity, of the totality of a person’s being, of what I have called the Self. There is a terrible spiritual famine in our world, but there are also people who don’t want to be beak-fed or fed with infant’s pap.

May I ask you to repeat the principal points of your system which may assist man to discover his totality and allay his spiritual famine, when he no longer adheres to the words of Christianity?

In the first place, I have no system, no doctrine, nothing of that kind. I am an empiricist, with no metaphysical views at all. I have only hypotheses. From them I have gained some basic principles. There is the self, which is the totality of one’s being, known and unknown, conscious and unconscious, as opposed to the distinction between physical and psychic. Then there are the archetypes, those images of instinct. For instinct is not just an outward thrust, it also takes part in the representation of forms. The animal, for example, has a certain idea of the plant, since he recognizes it. Our instincts do not express themselves only in our actions and reactions, but also in the way we formulate what we imagine. Instinct is not only biological, it is also, you might say, spiritual. And it always repeats certain forms which can be studied down the ages among all peoples. These are the archetypes.

The crossing of a river, now, that is an archetypal situation. It’s an important moment, a risk. There is danger in the water, on the banks. Not for nothing did Christianity invent great St. Christopher, the giant who carried the infant Jesus through the water. Today men don’t have that experience very often, or others of that sort either. I remember river crossings in Africa with crocodiles, and unknown tribes on the other side; one feels that one’s destiny—human destiny, almost—is at stake. Every man has his own way of approaching the crossing, you see. And think of King Albrecht’s death near Wettingen, too: the knights were hesitant, not very determined, one can’t be at all sure that they would have attacked the king just anywhere. But they surprised him in the middle of the ford, in the place where fate strikes—and jumped at the chance.

There is also the collective unconscious, that immense treasury, that great reservoir, whence mankind draws the images, the forces, which it translates into very different languages, but whose common source is being found out more clearly all the time. So many coincidences come from there.

Excerpted from C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters, pp. 412-415